What do you guys think?
If you haven't played with Joey, he's a 6'4" lanky 3pt stroking, rebounding machine with good handles. He played with us in BBA2, check out his stats: BBA2
At least we'd have someone to match up with Rob Ma's height.
This would make 13 of us in BBA6. We had 12 last season. I don't think 13 would be an issue with our current 3v3 setup, but some people have suggested we move to 4v4 games.
It could work, but here are my concerns/opinions:
- I prefer 3v3 for increased floor space
- 3v3 gives more people rest in between games, which was in high demand in previous seasons
- 3v3 is our past setup, and would be easier to create teams and schedule based on experience
- Continuity of stats: the modern age of BBA (3,4,5) has all been 3v3. Switching to 4v4 disrupts some inter-seasonal stat comparisons, ie. PPG, RPG, APG.
- Unknown number of team-matchups in 4v4: If some enterprising BBAer could put together a mock 4v4 team roster, we could see how many of these teams would be able to actually play against each other. (ie. a team of Klo-hrb-dan-dav can't play any other team with either of those 4 players on it) This may or may not be an issue, just something we have to investigate.
But if 4v4 is what people want and we can make it work, I am down to give it a shot.
Here is my BBA5 team creation excel sheet if you would like to use it as a template for either 3v3 or 4v4 team creation. But before anyone jumps into that, we need to decide about Joey.
Alright, I sent Joey a message asking him if he wants to play.
ReplyDeleteI prefer 3v3
ReplyDelete